We real cool. We Left school. We Lurk late. We Strike straight. We Sing sin. We Thin gin. We Jazz June. We Die soon.The brief and quickly escalating poem, made up of fragments and phrases, that is We Real Cool, serves as a warning for kids that delivers the commonly known message "Stay in school, kids". It is quick and to the point when asking the question: "Do you really want to live fast, die young?". Looking at the historical context of this poem readers can quickly see that it is from what we would call the "post-modern era", where narrators drift away from common rhythmic tradition and deliver messages more known to the current audience. A particularly interesting aspect of the poem is its consistent, catchy rhythm; with the lines being able to be delivered like a rap song with beat boxing behind it. This effect is created by the use of an artificial pause caused by a line break after the first word of each sentence (except the very first one). This poem has proved to be complex and difficult when attempting to pinpoint a certain kind of foot and meter to it. Although the rhythm stays consistent, the syllables and stressed in each line don't BECAUSE of this artificial rhythm founded on line breaks. I find it very interesting how it is possible to create a stable and consistent rhythm from LACK of measurable rhythm. It's almost paradoxical in a way. I can't help but think about the possibility of meaning hidden behind this complex paradox. The poem is quick and unmeasured... Is that how the "real cool" kids live their lives?, and could this perceived stability represent how common it is for kids to experience this?
Thursday, April 16, 2015
Poem Post #5: Reflecting on: Gwendolyn Brooks, “We Real Cool”
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Poem Post #4: Reflecting on: John Donne, “Death, be not proud”
Death, be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadful, for thou art not so;
For those whom thou think'st thou dost overthrow
Die not, poor Death, nor yet canst thou kill me.
From rest and sleep, which but thy pictures be,
Much pleasure; then from thee much more must flow,
And soonest our best men with thee do go,
Rest of their bones, and soul's delivery.
Thou art slave to fate, chance, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poison, war, and sickness dwell,
And poppy or charms can make us sleep as well
And better than thy stroke; why swell'st thou then?
One short sleep past, we wake eternally
And death shall be no more; Death, thou shalt die. I really like this sonnet. It empowers mortals, and with a few silly logical fallacies, it actually presents itself as an expression of bravery, fearlessness, and courage. At first glance, it seems like a desperate attempt to deny the reality of death, but after reading it a few times, we can see that the narrator does not exactly deny death, but minimizes it instead. Personifying death and then bringing it down like you would a human is precisely what Donne is going for here. He claims that no matter how much death hurts us, it will eventually die off. This, of course, is silly to say when talking about death mainly because it is not a tangible force with feelings or reasoning, but it can be related to human beings in circumstances that reminisce the acts of "death". Look at dictators for example, they might as well be death; undeniable, all powerful, and give off an ominous feeling from their wrathful aura. Now picture a man using the same argument Donne uses to ridicule death to ridicule a dictator. This is what I feel Donne is aiming for. He is exclaiming that the abuse of power senselessly might as well be meaningless because in the end, the abuser will die, and the human race will still go on. "One short sleep past, we wake eternally And death shall be no more; Death [abusive being causing senseless killing], thou shalt die." I feel that this quote successfully summarizes what I'm trying to get at.
Sunday, April 12, 2015
Poem Post #3: Responding to: Robert Herrick, “To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time”
Gather ye rosebuds while ye may, Old Time is still a-flying; And this same flower that smiles today Tomorrow will be dying. The glorious lamp of heaven, the sun, The higher he’s a-getting, The sooner will his race be run, And nearer he’s to setting. That age is best which is the first, When youth and blood are warmer; But being spent, the worse, and worst Times still succeed the former. Then be not coy, but use your time, And while ye may, go marry; For having lost but once your prime, You may forever tarry.
This particular poem is, funnily enough, extremely reminiscent of "To His Coy Mistress" by Andrew Marvell, which we analyzed in class not too long ago. If this was Perrine's style of literary fiction, he would refer to it as the commercial kind. Similarly to Marvell's poem, the sole purpose of this text falls on entertaining and bringing a smile to the audience Herrick may be addressing. Actually, thinking about it, Herrick may have not meant for this to be funny at all, and perhaps he is just trying to get laid. I've made this remark because of the time period in which this was written. 1591-1674, which is the age in which Herrick lived, reveals that he was unaware that his writing, read in today's times, is offensive and kind of hurtful for women, since it lacks the sensitivity towards the awareness of women's problems. The reason why we can find a comedic light in this piece of writing is because the interpretive audience has increased from just women, to everyone with a fair understanding of the process of life. With that being said, the once insensitive and pretentious message that this poem possessed, has transformed into a comedic message fueled by ignorance backed up by a time gap. Elementally, this poem is funny because it seems like a sex-ridden individual is attempting to use fine speech and poor rhetoric to convince women to sleep with him. The poor rhetoric part comes not from the argument of time, which would make it a good argument since there is no counter to time, but because he never expresses that he doesn't want the women to just have sex, but to have sex with him, which is the perceived overall intention of the poem.
How pathetic will our writing and rhetoric mechanisms look to individuals 100 years from now?
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
Poem Post #2: Responding to "The Negro Speaks of Rivers" by Langston Hughes
I’ve known rivers:
This poem, to say the least, is interesting. The body of the poem is completely reminiscent of the title, and there doesn't seem to be any specific revelation of meaning through the body of the poem towards its title. It's almost like an anti-joke, not in the way that it is amusing or entertaining, but that it doesn't take any unexpected turns or have a specific line that illuminates meaning. This is really complex because at this point in time, a poem that is predictable is unexpected. In a way, the fact that we expect the unexpected, also means that we do not expect the expected. It's difficult to explain but I hope you follow what I mean... I also feel like this surprising lack of surprise is intentional by the author of the poem. Perhaps it contributes to the intended meaning of the body of the poem. Judging by the time period in which Langston Hughes lived (1902-1967), he probably experienced a good amount of racism and witnessed first hand what segregation was like at the time. From this information, it can be derived that his poems have to do something with the grim past of his ancestors, and perhaps in this specific poem, he is taking the role of an African being taken away from his family through the rivers around the world whose only option to cope is to talk about his surroundings to forget about what he is going through. At least for a sole instant.
I’ve known rivers ancient as the world and older than the
flow of human blood in human veins.
My soul has grown deep like the rivers.
I bathed in the Euphrates when dawns were young.
I built my hut near the Congo and it lulled me to sleep.
I looked upon the Nile and raised the pyramids above it.
I heard the singing of the Mississippi when Abe Lincoln
went down to New Orleans, and I’ve seen its muddy
bosom turn all golden in the sunset.
I’ve known rivers:
Ancient, dusky rivers.
My soul has grown deep like the rivers.
This poem, to say the least, is interesting. The body of the poem is completely reminiscent of the title, and there doesn't seem to be any specific revelation of meaning through the body of the poem towards its title. It's almost like an anti-joke, not in the way that it is amusing or entertaining, but that it doesn't take any unexpected turns or have a specific line that illuminates meaning. This is really complex because at this point in time, a poem that is predictable is unexpected. In a way, the fact that we expect the unexpected, also means that we do not expect the expected. It's difficult to explain but I hope you follow what I mean... I also feel like this surprising lack of surprise is intentional by the author of the poem. Perhaps it contributes to the intended meaning of the body of the poem. Judging by the time period in which Langston Hughes lived (1902-1967), he probably experienced a good amount of racism and witnessed first hand what segregation was like at the time. From this information, it can be derived that his poems have to do something with the grim past of his ancestors, and perhaps in this specific poem, he is taking the role of an African being taken away from his family through the rivers around the world whose only option to cope is to talk about his surroundings to forget about what he is going through. At least for a sole instant.
Monday, April 6, 2015
Poem Post #1: Responding to ¨Pass/Fail¨ by Linda Pastan
You will never graduate
from this dream
of blue books.
No matter how
you succeed awake,
asleep there is a test
waiting to be failed.
The dream beckons
with two dull pencils,
but you haven't even
taken the course;
when you reach for a book -
it closes its door
in your face; when
you conjugate a verb -
it is in the wrong
language.
Now the pillow becomes
a blank page. Turn it
to the cool side;
you will still smother
in all of the feathers
that have to be learned
by heart.
What is it that is stopping us from ¨graduating from our dreams¨ but ourselves? Why is this test determined to be failed? Perhaps this poem is about the physical body growing up and letting go of its past, and about the spirit never actually growing old. ¨You will never graduate from this dream of blue books¨ could mean, ¨You will never let go of this goal or depression that is bothering you¨, hence the color blue. No matter how good you are while you are awake, when you're asleep you are vulnerable and exposed to who you really are. Sort of reminds me of ¨Mirror¨ by Sylvia Plath, since when you see yourself, you see the absolute truth. When you're asleep, you can't hide anything. You aren't prepared for the truth, hence why Pastan says ¨you haven't even taken the course¨. Also, Pastan points out that when you ¨reach for a book - it closes its door in your face, meaning that there is nothing that will help you except experience. You can't learn or read about how to face the truth, you can only experience it. ¨Wrong language¨, meaning misunderstanding. We won't be able to understand what we see in our dreams, or come up with an appropriate reaction to what we see, because we are not in control. ¨... All of the feathers that have to be learned by heart¨, once again reinforcing the thought that learning is only achieved through experience. Through reading this poem while in school, I feel like it touches on how we test ourselves, and those tests are the most accurate when it comes to reflecting who we are.
Friday, April 3, 2015
Reflecting on "Danse Russe" by William Carlos Williams
While reading this poem I found myself thinking about how the narrator cherishes his time better when he is alone and everyone else is asleep. The sun is a flame-white disc, it is a beautiful day at nighttime for the narrator, and he can love himself the most while he is alone, because nobody can contradict him. My experience with the poem revolved around how easily I can relate to this poem, suddenly I believed that it had to do with introverted thinking. Perhaps this poem is about introverted people, and how they can regain energy by being alone and find bliss in silence. There is quite a lot that can be extracted from these poems, and most of it comes from within ourselves, just like the happiness of introverts.
Reflecting on "Mirrors" by Sylvia Plath
First of all, I found this poem to be very very "Plath". Having read the bell jar, I could see her very characteristic writing style and purpose reflect a lot in this poem. It was reflecting to common emotional struggles specifically females find themselves in. In this specific poem I saw the struggle of self appreciation and the weight put on appearance by society. Plath touches on the complexity of the truthfulness of the mirror and called anything that might affect the image on the mirror "liars" (candles and the moon). My specific experience while closely reading this poem was realizing how much the TPCASTT approach actually helps understand a poem. I've never studied poems closely so I am very inexperienced and found myself always guessing when it came to understanding the meaning of poems, but going through the TPCASTT process I was actually surprised when I noticed little key details that carried the story through and led to properly understanding what's going on. I am finally beginning to really appreciate poetry as a powerful tool of communication and I finally feel like I can really understand the complex thoughts these authors are conveying through their poems.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)